On March 22, 2021, the Judge issued an Order squarely rejecting the Postal Services motion. The class members estate (or surviving relative) can submit a claim form on behalf of the class member. Once you return to us a signed completed Declaration form and any other documents supporting your claim, we will prepare a complete claim package (including legal argument) for submission to the EEOC Judge. The best way to provide this information is to email us at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com. In our view, this order reflects the Judges determination to press forward as fast as possible despite all efforts by USPS to delay and disrupt the claim review process. We had asked that the Judge order USPS to provide the NRP Activity Files for every Claimant directly to the Judge and the Claimants themselves. While GODADDY.COM LLC was its first registrar, . Therefore, these activity files should already be in the possession of Phase I Class Counsel. Second, the Administrative Judge noted that review of claims has begun, and that she hopes to begin, if possible, issuing orders and decisions on claims in the coming months! Please continue to monitor our website for more updates in the coming weeks. Although as discussed above the Judge did not think it was a good idea to opt-out of this case, she noted that people have the legal right to do so. If you have any questions, please feel free to email us at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com or call us at 585-272-0540. If you think you have witnesses who can provide a supporting statement, go ahead and ask them to do so. The EEOC Judge has issued a Case Management Order requiring all claimants to submit information to verify class membership and identify all categories of relief. The Judge reiterated that Special Masters will be used to speed up the claim review process, and the Judge rejected all USPS objections to the use of Special Masters. 7. Judge Roberts-Draper indicated that she would issue a written order providing her decisions on some pending procedural motions. In the past few days, we have received a very large number of calls and emails related to this case. It is important to state the name of the deceased class member, and the contact information for the estate (or surviving relative). She said that in the coming weeks, the EEOC will issue a notice to all of the claimants about the EEOC website. With this clarification, we will continue the time-consuming process of preparing the claim submissions for the Judges consideration. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. The next status conference is set for January 24, 2020. Our approach would lead to the fastest means of considering all Class Member claims in a fair manner. As always, please continue to monitor this website for any updates. As Phase 1 Class Counsel, responsible for the leading the charge that led to the EEOCs finding that the Agency created and implemented a program that discriminated against thousands of US Postal employees, our offices are honored to lead the fight during Phase II to ensure that there is a fair and efficient process designed to evaluate claimants and the relief they may be entitled to. Previously, we urged all of our clients to complete and return Declaration forms to us no later than March 25, 2019. However, there is no indication at this time that the Agency is prepared to make any settlement offer to any individual claimant. We understand any references by the EEOC Administrative Judge to the year 2020 was made in error and instead refers to 2022. On February 11, 2019, Class Counsel filed a proposed Case Management Order to establish a comprehensive claims determination process. For example, we reported that there had been some confusing information provided by the EEOCs administrator. This same deadline (April 30, 2019) applies to all supporting documentation you would like to submit to us. In other words, please do not contact the EEOC or the Postal Service about your claim without checking with us first. If the EEOC orders the Postal Service to pay attorney fees related to your claim, those fees would come directly to us and not relate in any way to the 30% contingency fee payment.Of course, as the case proceeds, we are unable to predict what the final outcome will be. Because of each of you and your willingness to speak out about the injustices you and others like you faced, the Agency has been found to have discriminated against injured employees and now they must face the consequences for their actions and provide relief to those people who are found to have been injured! The Postal Service is responsible for sending your claim to the Administrative Judge -- you do not need to take any action to bring your claim before the Administrative Judge. We strongly encourage timely cooperation if you receive the notice from the EEOC. Third, the Judge stated that the EEOC plans to begin hearings on some claims sometime in the middle of 2023. The Order sets out that Class Members who did not retain Class Counsel are not represented by our law firms. Thank you for all of your patience. The bottom-line is this: we will take all steps necessary to provide the Judge with timely submissions for all our clients. As of July 15, 2019, we have filed a legal brief (Statement) and evidence on behalf of all Claimants who are represented by our law firms. Before concluding the call, the Administrative Judge indicated that the EEOC plans to have a website available in the coming weeks that will be specifically devoted to this case. If you have not yet retained Class Counsel to represent you in your individual claim, and you now would like to retain Class Counsel, please contact us at NRPclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com or by calling us at (585) 272-0540 or faxing us at (585) 272-0574. The Judge has not yet made clear exactly how she plans to move forward with reviewing the information or issuing relief decisions. We will represent you before an EEOC administrative judge. A status conference has been scheduled by the Administrative Judge for November 19, 2019 at 2:00 pm EST. In advance of this conference, per the request of the Administrative Judge, our offices re-submitted all claimant related documents for her consideration. In response to the Administrative Judges February Order setting out a process to review claims by the use of Special Masters, the Postal Service filed a motion seeking to both delay the case and encourage as many class members as possible to withdraw from the case. Thank you. Even though we cannot predict with certainty every twist and turn on the road ahead, we remain convinced that a fair and reasonable outcome can be achieved, if we continue forward with persistence and resolve. We continue to respond to each call and email in the order received. Thanks to all who have returned Declarations to us. We have not spoken with USPS attorneys about settlement of any claims. My Manager told me that I might be sent to work for Walmart or another company. To see the Motion that was filed, CLICK HERE. Among the revisions requested of the Agency was that all claimants without claim numbers are to be assigned claim numbers, and any columns or individuals previously removed by the Agency would be restored. The Order also states that the process to be used is that the Postal Service is to submit their legal brief and evidence by March 19, 2019; and that Class Member claimants are to submit their response briefs and evidence 20 days after that (although the Order notes that extensions to the deadlines may be permitted). We are hopeful that these additional resources will assist the Administrative Judge in the evaluation of the more than 28,000 claims that were filed. We will strive for a fair and efficient process that considers all important evidence and provides all relief that is due to the victims of the NRP. At Thomas & Solomon LLP, we forcefully protect those rights. (See EEOC Management Directive 110,Chapter 8, Section XII.C.) Our offices and the Postal Service also worked on adding additional claimant information to the spreadsheet. We are very grateful for the Judges willingness to discuss the possibility of settlement. My Supervisors or co-workers called me lazy due to my restrictions. We are pressing forward and will not be deterred, despite this latest delay tactic by USPS. But the general direction is clear: the Judge wants to move the claim process forward as fast as possible. One important issue was decided during the status conference. (Our firms did not seek any such extension.) In addition, the Administrative Judge has also requested that our offices eliminate a small number of duplicate entries. We all owe much of our success in this case to the unity, strength, and perseverance that the Class has shown in the face of unceasing attacks by the Postal Service for more than ten years. The value and strength of the lawsuit is that there are so many people who the Commission has found to have been harmed by the NRP. The bottom line is this: there is no indication at this time that the Agency is prepared to make any settlement offer to any individual claimant. 520-2008-00053X. This means that if you have updated your contact information, including address, phone number, email address, and/or name, through the EEOC website (www.eeoc-nrpphase2.com) or by calling the third party number identified in the EEOCs recent communication, you must also contact our office as well to update the information. If you would like to retain our firms at this time to represent you in your individual claim, please let us know immediately, and we will send you a retainer letter that must be signed by you and returned to our office. Meaning, the Agency has identified certain individuals they believe did not submit a timely claim to NEEOSIO. The letters state that the USPS has possession of your settlement claim form from the Pittman class action, and you can request a copy of the claim form from the USPS. Postal Service by employees with disabilities. For our clients, please provide your updated contact information to us. Important: the phone number referenced in the notice from the EEOC should read 1-877-465-4142, and the correct website link is as follows: https://www.eeoc-nrpphase2.com/Home/portalid/0. In particular, the EEOC Administrative Judge wants to have the relevant information in a spreadsheet format that would allow the Judge to easily access the information, with a goal of moving forward with the process of claim determination. In the case of Sandra McConnell, et al. USPS continues its stubborn opposition to providing money relief to claimants. To recap: in July 2020 the Judge issued an order setting up the use of Special Masters to speed up the claim review process, but USPS argued that the Judge lacked authority to use Special Masters and could not force USPS to pay for Special Masters; the Judges recent order, citing our legal briefing, brushed aside USPS objections.

Who Would Win In A Fight Aries Or Pisces, What Does Angie Mean In Spanish, Duluth Brewing And Malting, Articles T