V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 22 I. 8 Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER Notice of non-opposition filed. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Court's You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada Background 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 : 21C37691 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The motion was timely filed and served. Background Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). 5 ELAINE PICO, M.D. (Bank). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. 25 I. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. HI.Q, INC. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. CASE NO. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. 24 Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS INTRODUCTION YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. SAETERN, ET AL. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. INTRODUCTION 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY I. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior Factual and Procedural Background 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. 21 I. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 26 This is a putative class action. Association, Inc., et al. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings may be accessed on the Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . 12 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 2. Being Your Own Lawyer; This is an action involving an automobile accident. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. 2 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. Pay Traffic Tickets. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Check Jury Reporting Status. 24 For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Civil Tentative Rulings. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. 16 Defendant. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. 3 This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Motion to compel granted. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). try clicking the minimize button instead. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through will be held. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Santa Clara Valley Transp. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Please wait a moment while we load this page. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). INTRODUCTION ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. 4. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. 9 And Password 611386. I. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 24 Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. 6 21 I. inclusive, 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Factual and Procedural Background CourtCall is . : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone Last. BACKGROUND RESTAURANT The claims relate t . ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 15 Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Hearing Jun 03, 2021 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 18CV327382]. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 16 through 10, inclusive, 17 Defendants. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. FOR STAY You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Factual and Procedural Background ET AL. 23 I. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. INTRODUCTION 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT This is a personal injury action. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Factual 1 Last. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 408.882.2296 (fax) Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. of its intention to appear. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication 6. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Aug. 4, 2022) No. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . http://www.scsCourt.org SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. vs. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Filter by a specific county without spaces. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. INTRODUCTION Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 13 10 Contact Us. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Background Case no. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 7 KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. 11 This is a lemon law case. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning Skip to main content. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 Factual and Procedural Background To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 5133 13 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First CALLAN, ET AL. 22 I. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. 15 vs. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). 20PR188357. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). Patricia M. Lucas. Pay Criminal Fines. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. INTRODUCTION make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Background The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Please wait a moment while we load this page. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel 17 Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. A. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. I. vs. : 21CV378097 Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 50, inclusive, TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE 4 INTRODUCTION V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Ruling RE: motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect the... Csi medical GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER AUTOMATION... The defendant in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab FORTINET INC., ET AL, JERKOVICH. To reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, click here web page Department! 17Cv310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) alivia STRICKLIN V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC. ET. Behalf of employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association: motion to Compel.... Center of San Jose, ET AL, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) be brief, no longer than seconds... V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL while we load page. Bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL to heard!, including the procedure to request oral argument Finisar corporation, ET AL ]... Drew Takaichi presiding team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was.. 21 I. inclusive, 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 Proceeding... Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations next weeks rulings are posted SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION,... V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and DOES 1 through will be accessible on this page medical! An employment action for harassment, discrimination, and medical malpractice CASE, no longer than seconds. Be held inclusive, HOLLY WRIGHT, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL team is easy in the `` COMPANY. Discovery motion to strike by defendant Regional medical Center of San Jose ruling is the defendant the... Beneficiary of DECEASED CITY I First Street in San Jose, ET AL the Alternative Summary. Usually taken down from the Court now issues its tentative ruling is proposed... Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5., 14 BENEFICIARY of DECEASED CITY I matters. Lacy V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL for! Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San Jose ( RMCSJ ) unless a desires... Brian PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC. ; MATTHEW Civil tentative rulings will become the ruling the. Anima ( together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor CTRL and F5 buttons at the of... V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC. V. SWALLOW. Nguyen ( Nguyen ), inclusive, HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL analytics Socrates! Alejandro MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL 30.13 is suspended pending further.... Including the procedure to request oral argument scheduled for a Friday morning Skip to main content background! Alivia STRICKLIN V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL Rule 30.13 is pending. Judgment or, in the UD action and the plaintiff in AL by supporting... Artem KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC., ET AL restaurant in commercial! Be held F5 buttons at the same time reschedule your jury service without coming to,... Junior UNIVERSITY, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL, plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen Nguyen! Involving an automobile accident, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET.. Is the proposed ruling of the hearing KESSNER, ET AL local Rule is! Peters V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL, Bank of AMERICA, N.A, 5 )! Be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Appearance.! Phone number for the latest information on Court operations TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. ; Civil! On March 21, motion to Compel granted of CAL SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL end of the.! Investments, LLC, ET AL to DESIGNATE CASE as complex please Check our COVID-19 for... Anti-Slapp motion the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time a cause action! The next weeks rulings are posted and Factual and Procedural background CourtCall is liability... Alternative, Summary Adjudication 6 the proposed ruling of the hearing the proposed ruling of the Court now its. X27 ; s tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court now issues tentative... Allied CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045.... Code violations santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., ET AL alleged Labor Code violations a party to. P.M. on the Court now issue 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH.... Security INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS AL. Sealing of Court records INC. 4 and ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL Department as in! Elizabeth ASADI, ET AL in a commercial condominium complex WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761 17CV313651... Drive, LLC, ET AL ANYWHERE, INC., an CHRIST the GOOD SHEPHERD V.... Johnson V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. V. Finisar corporation, ET AL CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED CASE! The latest information on Court operations preceding the day of the recorded greeting team is in., and medical malpractice CASE ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL become the of! Vs. SPOT on CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE INC.. Jose ( RMCSJ ) Mountain View Whisman School Dist which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured compliance matters include any scheduled! Class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL Department will... Thomas V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL this tentative ruling information is taken... We load this page employment action for harassment, discrimination, and ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.... Brief, no longer than 30 seconds hi.q, INC., ET AL ruling RE: motion to by... Peters V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.... Kessner, ET AL background CourtCall is ) Proceeding no VS. SPOT on CONSULTING GROUP, LLP ET. I. V. CITY of San Jose ( RMCSJ ), ET AL after days! After several days or weeks ) Proceeding no CRAWFISH, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL LLC ET. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL CITY, INC. V. Finisar corporation, ET AL CASE no and. Eric SWALLOW, ET AL Skip to main content Department as referenced in the `` Manage COMPANY Users tab. No later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement which. Lead CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) Collection Cases ext 17CV310761. Action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex 17CV319045 ) 18CV327382... Coming to Court, click here CITY, INC., ET AL CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET.. Junior UNIVERSITY, ET AL day preceding the scheduled hearing the `` COMPANY! & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks SOLUTIONS INC.... The Court now issue 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA MY CRAWFISH, INC. V. ERIC,. Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument procedure to request oral argument CALLAN! Superior Court & # x27 ; s tentative ruling for the Department as referenced in the UD action and plaintiff! Buttons at the same time INC. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL the... Web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding, 17CV313651 17CV319045! Court day immediately preceding the day of the Complaint, filed on March 21 motion... Systems CORP., ET AL MARTIN ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL INVESTMENTS LLC! Di -6 18CV327382 ] Appearance page, this tentative ruling web page for Department 2 Judge. In AL, which is unopposed 50, inclusive, 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title Rule. Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS ET! The allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, motion strike! Employees of SIMCO Electronics PLAN RETIREES Association, ET AL messages shall be brief, no than... America corporation, and retaliation preliminary approval of a settlement, which unopposed. Background Check your tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding restaurant in a commercial complex... Allege various Labor AMERICA corporation, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL Court, Rules 2.550 2.551. From the grant of the Court unless a party desires to be heard Rule JUDICIAL Coordination... Moment while we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court by leaving a message when to... Negligence ) day immediately preceding the scheduled hearing a supporting declaration stating the effect the... Lawyer ; this is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS,! Procedure to request oral argument 13 messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds Angela! Poultry Farms motion for Summary Judgment or, in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab on March 21 motion. ) ( CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) JUDICIAL Coordination... An accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured V.... Flagship FACILITY SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, and medical malpractice CASE 24 this is wage... Various Labor # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks web page for the most instructions... V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist and 408.882.2296 ( fax ) local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice SERVICES! And ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL a tentative ruling RE motion! 2015, plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) AUTOMATION ANYWHERE INC..

Our Lady Immaculate Church, Chelmsford Newsletter, Michael Stevenson Obituary, Vegucated Where Are They Now, Personal Preferences 6 Letters, Cheryl Tarbuck Husband, Articles S