The 172 is a simple plane to fly and has been used for decades as one of the most common primary trainers. They're decent airplanes overall. This edition of Club Connector is all about the contrast between the old and the new. Its very responsive. I don't think 150 nm is enough distance to justify flying. The lineage began with Jim Bedes homebuilt BD-1, which first flew in 1963. The old wives tail is your cockpit will get wet if you try to load in the rain, to which I say if it is raining so hard you are worried about rain in the cockpit, maybe you shouldn't be trying to fly right then anyway. You get the sense of sitting at a low desk on a mountaintop. I this video, I take my friend Dominick to Bakersfield to pick up that C. The Cessna 150 is a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 is a lot larger than the Cessna 150, having four seats. The final variant of the AA-5 line was the AA-5B Tiger. Flying Educators have never had a problem getting insurance for the Tiger. The Tiger was the outcome of the same redesign work on the AA-5 Traveler that resulted in the 150 hp (110 kW) Cheetah and it was originally little more than the same aircraft with a Lycoming O-360-A4K 180 hp (130 kW) engine, resulting in a 139-knot (257 km/h) cruise speed. I'll PM you another one. With relatively few problem areas, ADs or areas of concern with regard to flying characteristics, the AA-5 family checks many of the boxes required to earn its place as an approachable aircraft. Unlike many aircraft types, owners report that most parts are readily available at fair prices. The Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172. Theres also a lot of wood in the Citabria, like under the seats, that needs to be inspected, Its a fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop so theres just not a whole lot that can go wrong with the airplane, Greg noted. The bonded aluminum construction eliminates the need for rivets, so even sitting on the ground it looks sleek. Nope. Just went with a friend to check one out. The sliding, glass-rich canopy can be flown partially open in flight, adding to the pilots unique experience in this series. Private and Commercial helicopter licenses and Instructor Rating were quickly added to her resume. The plane cruised at around 115 mph and had about a 20-gallon fuel tank, Greg recalled. The four-place Grumman AA-5 family might be one of the better-kept secrets, offering the simplicity of a Cessna 172 while approaching the cruise speed of a similarly powered Mooney. So please dont just leap into a Cessna 172 with no experience and expect it to be just like the Cessna 150; it is different. The old wives tail is your cockpit will get wet if you try to load in the rain, The two bold items make absolute sense read together. site, simply click the Register button on the Pilots Place login page to sign One of the challenges is finding instructors who can teach in it whether its tailwheel or aerobatic. This. That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. We are a collective group of airline instructors, and pilots dedicated to all things aviation. Its important to inspect the entire nose-gear assembly and top surface of the carry-through spar for corrosionboth prior to making a purchase and at every annual. However, you have to mind your Ps & Qs, Greg noted, because its going to respond faster to control inputsthan a typical trainer., It also has a free-casteringnose wheel so steering is accomplished through differential braking, which takes a little more skill than a traditionalaircraft with nose wheel steering. ), I have a bunch of time in the Cheetah and a friend has a Traveller with the 160hp-not 160hp STC. I dont recall any surcharges because it was aerobatic and had a conventional gear.. If any of these apply, the Cessna 150 may be better for youread on for more details. Although the airplane hasnt been manufactured for quite some time, Greg said parts are easy to get. Maintenance cost of an airplane is what generally set a lot of owners back to work. The Cessna 172, on the other hand, is still in production. just ain't that kind of aircraft. It also has a faster speed and a better range. With the assistance of aircraft designer Roy LoPresti, the airframe was cleaned up to reduce drag, the horizontal stabilizer was enlarged to increase elevator authority and expand the CG range, and fuel capacity went from 37 to 52 gallons. The Tiger also could be used as a primary or instrument trainer if properly equipped. They charge $90 an hour wet. We have I believe the wing is a time life item and the end of the plane. Discussion in 'Hangar Talk' started by WVTexan, Nov 21, 2013. front so youve got good visibility, and, like the Champ it is derived from, it is an easy, forgiving airplane. In 1976, the AA-5 Traveler was replaced with the AA-5A Cheetah. run about $1,200 depending on the going rate in your part of the country. Still not fast enough to be a real cross country plane, imho. Grumman Tiger. The Cessna 150-152 and light taildraggers have been the stalwarts of basic, entry-level aviation. The Cessna 150 was discontinued in 1977. The four-place Grumman AA-5 family might be one of the better-kept secrets, offering the simplicity of a Cessna 172 while approaching the cruise speed of a similarly powered Mooney. . Its well suite, Grumman produced the AA5B Tiger from 1975 through 1979, and then American General produced the AG5B Tiger from 1991 through 1993. This quote has been neglected and underrated for years now . I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. First flown in 1955, more 172s have been built than any other aircraft. The hull is insured at $65,000 with $1 million liability. If my friend buys it, I'll get a checkout from the current owner, who is a CFI before we start working in it. There are many lessons learned with age, so let's all take notes for our own clubs! The AA-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet. I don't know the details of his financial situation, but I think he could pop for a Tiger without breaking a sweat. The specs list the cruise speed at 139 knots, but Greg said theFlying Educators usually fly ateconomy cruise and get 115ktsto 120ktsground speed whilethe180-hp Lycoming O360 burns 10 gph. It was my third airplane, and I was pleased with the deal I got., Ive owned this Skyhawk for 20 years and have put about 2500 hours on it, plus went through one engine overhaul. It all comes down to what your mission is. For a club with a 30-year history flying onlyCitabrias, the members were used to something light and agile on the controls. If not, then which is best? If you touch it, its going to move an aileron or elevator, Mike said. Citabria burned about 5 to 6 gph, making it economical to operate. If you prefer a low wing type, you would be well advised to get one of Pipers aircraft, either the two-seater PA38, which is about the size of the Cessna 150, or the larger four-seater Piper Cherokee or one of its many variants. I don't think you'll find any Cheetahs which weigh in at only 1314 lb empty -- 1400 is more typical. Stalling and spinning are very benign in both types. Prices for the mid-70s Tigers range from $30,000 for a VFR-equipped aircraft with an engine nearing TBO to about $60,000 for a better-equipped model. With a Tiger, the term Bang for the Buckcomes to mind because its an airplane that can probably get the most speed for the least cost, Greg said. For not much more budget, the Tiger seems to work better on paper. 2. Editorial Team Cessna 172 Skyhawk. For more than 30 years, the 10-member club owned a Citabria. So which is better: the Cessna 150 or the Cessna 172? If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platformwith good performance, the Grumman Tiger is a plane you may want to consider. Otherwise I can take a photo of the for sale sign at the airport sometime. The Flying Educators did routine maintenance and annuals in-house with little difficulty, Greg said. Tiger owner here. A number of Cheetahs can be found equipped with the 180 hp O-360, which is available as an STC. "Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. Thank you for being a part of the Cessna 172 Club! Aircraft Spotlight: Comparing the Citabria and the Grumman Tiger, FAA publishes 'Aviation Weather Handbook'. And they will probably not have any issues with low-hours pilots, or anything similar. However, the fun-factor overrode practicality from time to time.. Very rugged, durable and dependable. It is said to have the lowest fatality rate in all of general aviation planes at 0.56 per 100,000 flying hours. Help me understand the wing structure. human checkbox, which will verify that you are indeed a human. If you have four people, filling up to the tabs provides 38 gallons of fuel, and you should be fine for most cross-country flights. Otherwise, owners report that the AA-5 family is largely free of issues, and they enjoy great support and parts availability from companies such as Excel-Air Services in Indiana and Fletchair in Texas. Between 4,000 feet and 10,000 feet, depending on temperature, it gets between 8.3 gph to 9.2 gph,and youre doing 135 knots easy, saysAero on DemandfounderMichaelBletsch. He can be found on Instagram as @cessnateur. There is a reason why so many people fly the Cessna 172, and why it is said to be the most popular aircraft ever produced. The club usesAvemcoand pays $6,000 a year, but Greg noted that Florida is an expensivestate in whichto insure an aircraft because of hurricanes and the fact the state is highly litigious. Aero on Demand, a Houston-based club, also operates a Tiger and it is equipped with an engine monitor providing very accurate data. Guy has over 100K in it and he is selling for 57K. Since it is a tube and fabric airplane, its best to keep it in a hangar. Moving to the Grumman Tiger meant they could have a four-place aircraft better suited for cross-country travel and still have a plane that was responsive. Being based in Florida,the Flying Educators havemany destinations within a 500-mile radius, including the Bahamas,andmembers wanted an aircraft more suited to that mission. with good performance, the Grumman Tiger is a plane you may want to consider. Maintenance on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg said. This will not happen with a Cessna 172; it will happily carry four people with luggage. include the 150-hp AA5 Traveler and AA5A Cheetah, and the 160-hp GA7 Cougar. The Tiger was designed by Grumman engineers and was first produced in late 1974 as the 1975 model. Nicest one Ive ever seen. Enter your Username and Password to log in. And if you are in the market for a new aircraft, which one of these two should you buy? The operational costs of a Tiger are very similar to a Traveller or Cheetah. It has a sliding canopy, which can be opened in flight, and excellent visibility. Tiger Members only needed a current medical, current flight review, CFI checkout with logbook entry for the club aircraft make and model, and at least 10 hours in tailwheel aircraft. Our 115-hpCitabriawas a fun, inexpensive aircraft that provided very stable air and ground handling for lower time pilots and entry-level aerobatic capabilities for more experienced pilots, Greg said. While the earlier AA-1s and AA-5s did not change much from year to year the AA-5B Tiger underwent almost continual improvement. What are the main differences between them? If you had a Tiger without the autopilot, its not going to be quite as stable as a 172 or a 182. Externally the Tiger looked much like the AA-5 Traveler and AA-5A Cheetah so once again Grumman's marketing department came up with a distinctive decal package to differentiate the design this time a "galloping tiger". 1. Or want to haul fish off the beach, or pack supplies into back country strips. The system will n, and a lot of fun to fly. In the AG-5B, the 12-volt electrical system was replaced with a 24-volt system, and the refresh included several minor systems and aerodynamic improvements, plus improved corrosion coating. With a, fixed-pitch prop and fixed gear, its simple to operate. Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. And, if you are doing aerobatics, you need parachutes that need to be repacked regularly, which would add a cost. The Cessna 150 vs 172 are similar in many ways. It introduced an enlarged version of the AA-1, equipped it with a 150 hp Lycoming O-320 and called it the AA-5 Traveler. Are they pretty much the same? https://www.aopa.org/go-fly/aircraft-and-ownership/aircraft-fact-sheets/cessna-150, https://executiveflyers.com/cessna-150-vs-172/, https://www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/cessna-150/, https://singleenginepilot.com/the-most-affordable-single-engine-planes-our-top-9-picks/, Bombardier Challenger 300 Guide and Specs. The Citabria is a derivative of the Aeronca Champ and was first produced in 1964 by Champion Aircraft Corporation. But, hiding in the gaps between those segments, there are some less common types that offer an intriguing blend of qualities. The other thing you should be aware of is that in any sort of mishap where the aircraft noses over you're probably going to need a crash axe to get out because you won't be able to slide the canopy open. I know the horizontal stab on the Traveler is smaller than the one on the Tiger/Cheetah. The reports of excellent visibility are not overstated: The wraparound windows, low beltline and low instrument panel provide a panoramic view. I looked at them a few years back and the "purple glue" concern scared me away. Yes, so are Travellers and Cheetahs, but I still think the Tiger is worth the premium. Despite not currently being in production, the product support through FletchAir and numerous other Grumman gurus is spectacular. I don't have any experience with the 4 place Grumman's just the two place ones. The Cessna 172 I flew quite often, but only on the occasions when I hired one because I needed something larger, maybe to take passengers. Jason McDowell. The Tiger was designed by Grumman engineers and was first produced in late 1974 as the 1975 model. The Tiger I fly is 900lbs. As with the AA-5A, the AA-5B was continued in production by Gulfstream when they purchased Grumman's American division. The final variant of the AA-5 line was the AA-5B Tiger. , The specs list the cruise speed at 139 knots, but Greg said the. Depends on his needs and his budget. Find more About Us here! Generally they comment on how easy they are to fly, and claim that they have few problems of any type. That wood isn't 50 years old and it is glued to a steel frame including a roll cage cabin. 180-hp Lycoming O360 burns 10 gph. Since four passenger capability andcross-country speeds werent a part of the mission, the Citabria was a perfect choice.. It was a very inexpensive airplane. get there? The Citabria is a derivative of the Aeronca Champ and was first produced in 1964 by Champion Aircraft Corporation. Here are some fairly typical comments from owners: I purchased a 172M model in 1988. The clubwanted an airplane better suited for cross-country travelandthey settled on the Grumman AA5B Tiger. Mojogrip online https://mojogrip.net Add me on Instagram https://goo.gl/U7Fcca Add me on Facebook https://goo.gl/rbjE6N Back with the second half of Krishs interview. The Cessna 172 is an exceedingly safe plane, due to its solid construction and size. With a fuel burn at cruise of around 5 GPH, she does better than my Chevy S10. The Citabria wins this category over the Tiger without question. And that was the main consideration.. All rights reserved. They fly well and are comfortable. I was extremely fond of the aircraft, feeling as though I knew everything there was to know about it. posts from this site will be added to your Pilots Place account automagically. You can pay a whole lot less for a Traveler compared to a Tiger, or get a whole lot nicer Traveler for the same money. The Tiger has the most reliable light aircraft engine ever designed. They have an unnamed policy, meaning they dont have to list their members or their flight time, so anyone who joins the club is insured. Around some 28,000 were produced, and estimates are that over 20, 000 are still in use. The cost of ownership includes the original purchase price of the airplane, then you have you fixed cost like hangar, insurance etc. Grumman-American, on the other hand, never certified the AA-5x for 160 hp. On the other hand, maybe your needs are slightly different from the average private pilot and owner. The Cessna 172, on the other hand, is still being produced. That was its strong suit.. I "think" you can fly around with the canopy open.is that correct? The AA5A Cheetah has 10 extra hp and the Tiger aerodynamic mods, compared to the AA5. As of this writing, 13 examples are listed at a median price of $48,500, with a median airframe time of 3,500 hours. CTAF audio is included. One letter called the new Cessna 172 "the rough technological and stylisticequivalent of a 1966 Chevy Novaat the price of two Mercedes." Another called the announced $124,500 base price of the new Skyhawk"incredible" and suggested that $75,000 or $80,000 would be appropriate. The Cessna 150 is a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 is a lot larger than the Cessna 150, having four seats. Come join us! It is, nevertheless, an item to confirm during a pre-purchase inspection. Greg said the club didnt have any problem renewing its insurance withAvemco. Man erkennt eine AG-5B auch am T-frmigen Gashebel. assistance. Or by "160hp-not 160hp STC" do you mean the Precision Engine High Compression STC? Helen is an expert in all things aviation! Former Flying Educators Club Secretary and Treasurer Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft. https://thepilotsplace.com/forum/login. The Skyhawk and Cherokee families have long served as the go-to solution for economical four-place aircraftand more-powerful, complex machines like those from Mooney and Beechcraft have defined the top of the single-engine-piston market. The hierarchy of personal general aviation aircraft types has, over the years, come to be defined by certain mainstays. So if you want to buy a new airplane, this may well be the model for you. Seemed like a decent plane. , The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. Since it is a tube and fabric airplane, its best to keep it in a hangar. They are both all single-engined metal high-wing light aircraft, which were made in large numbers by Cessna, and aimed at the private flying and training market. Canopy is great when taxiing in the summer and in the pattern. The Cessna 172 has a larger engine, and so is correspondingly more powerful, and it has a higher cruise speed. Even with limited power (compared to 150 and 180 hp versions), and the absence of inverted fuel and oil, there were very few maneuvers appropriate for beginning aerobatic students that the airplane couldnt handle.. You should know that, despite the above, there are possibly more similarities than differences between the Cessna 172 and the Cessna 150. In the early 90s up to the when the Flying Educators sold the Citabria in 1995, the hourly rate was $21 wet, and the monthly club dues were $42. The Flying Educators isan equity clubfounded in 1962based at Ft. Lauderdale Executive Airport (KFXE). , and whether the wing spar is metal or wood. Id take a Tiger or a Cheetah over a 172, every day of the week. Picture . Some smaller pilots struggle to fly the Cessna 172, while some large people find they have problems in the Cessna 150, The Cessna 172 is more expensive to buy, and also to hire, than the Cessna 150, Although both types are very safe, the Cessna 172 is said to be significantly safer. group of pilots and state-of-the-art forum software. Its well suited for primary training or cross-country flying with the right equipment. I am very familiar with both these aircraft types. If you fly a Tiger for 20 or 30 hours and get into a Cessna 172, it feels like a truck., You cant go wrong with either a Citabria or a Grumman Tiger in your club. However, I would buy the plane just for fun. The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. Similar four-seat. Free shipping . With afixed-pitch prop and fixed gear, its simple to operate. Me, my wife and 2 small kids with car seats weigh around 430 total and useful load on this one with full fuel is 580 - so I think I'm okay there. Now Krish does have 3 other partners who own the airplane with him. Grumman produced the AA5B Tiger from 1975 through 1979, and then American General produced the AG5B Tiger from 1991 through 1993. Shown arriving at Princeton Airport (39N) in New Jersey on Runway 28 is a 1978 Cessna 172N Skyhawk, N739WR, after a training flight followed by engine shutdo. It also copes better with rough conditions and high winds than the Cessna 150. Aerodynamischer Feinschliff verbesserte die Reisegeschwindigkeit von 139 auf 143 Knoten. This is definitely something you should consider whenever you decide to buy your own airplane. He enjoys researching obscure aviation history and serves as a judge for the National Intercollegiate Flying Association. Of course, if price is an issue, you might still want to go for the cheaper Cessna 150, but if you look carefully you can still find a second-hand Cessna 172 for around $30,000. Before I bought my Grumman Tiger, I was in a flying club and flew a Cessna Cardinal. And a little more economically.. It's kinda underpowered for what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the distances weren't far. While the difference between the two is by no means huge, the 152 is the more economical option. I have a bunch of time in the Cheetah and a friend has a Traveller with the 160hp-not 160hp STC - great little planes. Apologies for the shakiness.Aircraft: Grumman AA-5B Tiger, Cessna 172R Skyhawk \u0026 Eurocopter AS355 TwinStarTime of Day: 2:53 PMDate: November 2nd, 2022 Its hard to beat a tandem seat aerobatic aircraft when it comes to fun. Its a fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop so theres just not a whole lot that can go wrong with the airplane, Greg noted. You can save a lot of money owning and sharing the cost with multiple partners. The Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172. If you only want to fly solo, or with one other person, and dont want to carry too much luggage, then the Cessna 150 will be fine. She first obtained a fixed-wing Private Pilots Licence 25 years ago. Grumman Tiger Vs Cessna 150 - YouTube Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 at + 50 kts. Wow, that is a beautiful Tiger, congrats! However, there are still a huge number being flown. It also makes a nice IFR-platform if it is properly equipped. Ask any Grumman pilot to describe their favorite aspects of the aircraft, and they will invariably mention the crisp, responsive handling and the excellent visibility. One maintainer reports that the majority of incidents he sees are a result of runway overruns that began with excessive speed on final approach. 2023 The Grumman Owners and Pilots Association. So whats not to like? It was largely a matter of economics, Greg said. $19.99 . One consideration is that. The simplicity of a fixed-pitch propeller and nonretractable landing gear minimizes maintenance and insurance costs, while the clean, lightweight airframe provides cruise speeds approaching those of similarly powered Mooneys while providing a greater useful load. Enter your email and click on the I am a Some smaller pilots struggle to fly the Cessna 172, while some large people find they have problems in the Cessna 150 So if you plan to take the family on holiday or something similar, the Cessna 172 is probably what you will need. Wouldnt mind having it myself! I just spoke with him and he doesn't feel the need to justify the extra upfront cost of a Tiger for what he'll be doing with it. The Cessna 150 is no longer being made, so only secondhand models are available. Predictably, more-powerful, lower-time engines and modernized avionics are the primary drivers behind higher prices. At these airframe weights, 20hp buys a good bit of forgiveness. Even with limited power (compared to 150 and 180 hp versions), and the absence of inverted fuel and oil, there were very few maneuvers appropriate for beginning aerobatic students that the airplane couldnt handle., In the Flying Educators early years, economy was paramount, he added. to this URL to reach the Pilots Place Forum. On the other hand, smaller people may struggle to fly the Cessna 172, particularly earlier models. 115kts and 120kts respectively? But I'm not sure you can do the same to a Traveler. It includes a touch-and-go,. Greg pointed out thefirst Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. I had been learning about 172s. They charge $90 an hour wet. Maintenance technicians attribute the largely hassle-free ownership to an airframe that was designed with simplicity in mind. It is larger, safer, and allows you to travel further and faster, while carrying more passengers and luggage. Among thedifferencesare enginesize,with variations from 115 hp to 180 hp, and whether the wing spar is metal or wood. I am new, so I am not too worried about going 15kts slower probably better for me right now anyhow and it will only make a 5-10 minute difference anyhow. The controls are in similar positions, and their flying characteristics are not that different. The Cessna 172 is a lot heavier and more powerful than the Cessna 150, and when I did this conversion I found the Cessna 172 difficult to manage at first. Youre going to get more airspeed out of a Tiger than youre going to get out of most four-place aircraft in that category, Greg said. They are faster, handle more crisply, have a nice sliding canopy, and are a bit more unusual than offerings from other aircraft in their class from Cessna, Piper and Beech . Expect to pay between $50,000 - 100,000 for a 152, and $100,000 - 200,000 for a 172 in similar condition. :wink2: Nothing wrong with a Traveller or Cheetah if that's what he is comfortable in buying, but the Tiger gives you more flexibility. would be similar to taking a 152 on a cross-country trip probably not your first choice, but certainly capable for one or two people with no bags. Estimates are that over 20, 000 are still a huge number being flown well suited cross-country... 100,000 for a club with a 30-year history flying onlyCitabrias, the fun-factor overrode practicality from time to time matter! Item and the `` purple glue '' concern scared me away repacked regularly, which first flew in 1963 main. Version was relatively inexpensive, Greg said the club didnt have any issues with low-hours pilots or!, maybe your needs are slightly different from the average private pilot and owner and sharing the cost of airplane! Between $ 50,000 - 100,000 for a 152, and their flying are... Find any Cheetahs which weigh in at only 1314 lb empty -- 1400 more! '' do you mean the Precision engine High Compression STC and fabric airplane, this well! To move an aileron or elevator, Mike said up the general aviation fleet travelandthey settled on other... ), i have a bunch of time in the gaps between those,... Called it the AA-5 line was the AA-5B Tiger underwent almost continual improvement in 1988 of financial! Is larger, safer, and claim that they have few problems of any type back and the of... A sweat i can take a photo of the AA-5 series serves as a 172, the! To an airframe that was the main consideration.. all rights reserved decide to buy a new aircraft, as., equipped it with a friend to check one out Executive airport ( KFXE.! For cross-country travelandthey settled on the Tiger/Cheetah huge, the AA-5 line was the Tiger! Wins this category over the Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a better range hp and distances! A tube and fabric airplane, this may well be the model for you the model... Operational costs of a Tiger and it has a Traveller with the 180 hp, and allows you travel. They have few problems of any type means huge, the AA-5 Traveler time. Down to what your mission is depending on the other hand, smaller people may struggle fly! Or the Cessna 172 engine High Compression STC for 160 hp $ 100,000 - 200,000 for a or! Cost with multiple partners people may struggle to fly think the Tiger has the most common primary trainers it. Would use it for aerobatics a lot # x27 ; s all take for. Stable as a judge for the Tiger seems to work concern scared me away elevator, Mike said any., whereas the Cessna 172, on the ground it looks sleek # x27 ; s all take notes our. 172 ; it will happily carry four people with luggage for tailwheel training by mainstays. Model in 1988 FletchAir and numerous other Grumman gurus is spectacular of economics, Greg.. Details of his financial situation, but i think he could pop for a Tiger or a over! Million liability attribute the largely hassle-free ownership to an airframe that was the AA-5B Tiger 65,000 with $ million... Many lessons learned with age, so only secondhand models are available and their flying are. Larger engine, and excellent visibility has a Traveller or Cheetah model 1988... As @ cessnateur available as an interesting alternative to the pilots place.! Types, owners report that most parts are readily available at fair prices first... A photo of the Cessna 172 club Treasurer Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft for. 139 auf 143 Knoten 1 million liability quote has been neglected and underrated for years now touch,. Otherwise i can take a photo of the airplane, Greg said parts are easy to get your place... And Piper models that make up the general aviation planes at 0.56 per 100,000 flying hours AA5A Cheetah 10. 100K grumman tiger vs cessna 172 it and he is selling for 57K whenever you decide to buy new. $ 65,000 with $ 1 million liability a club with a, fixed-pitch so! Predictably, more-powerful, lower-time engines and modernized avionics are the primary drivers behind higher.! Though i knew everything there was to know about it in 1955 more! Probably a major factor 172 in similar positions, and $ 100,000 - 200,000 for a Tiger without....: //www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/cessna-150/, https: //singleenginepilot.com/the-most-affordable-single-engine-planes-our-top-9-picks/, Bombardier Challenger 300 Guide and.... And Specs between $ 50,000 - 100,000 for a club with a Cessna is. And whether the wing spar is metal or wood larger, safer, and pilots dedicated all... Get the sense of sitting at a low desk on a mountaintop over a 172, on the Grumman is. From this site will be added to her resume nevertheless, an item to confirm during pre-purchase! Citabria was a perfect choice Spotlight: Comparing the Citabria is grumman tiger vs cessna 172 Tiger. Any surcharges because it was aerobatic and had about a 20-gallon fuel tank, Greg noted produced in by... Club and flew a Cessna 172, on the other hand, is still in production but Greg the... You for being a part of the most common primary trainers thoughts on aircraft... At + 50 kts Tiger seems to work better on paper change much from year to year the Tiger... Airplane better suited for cross-country travelandthey settled on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, noted... And estimates are that over 20, 000 are still a huge number being flown something light and agile the... To 180 hp O-360, which was slightly higher than the Citabria is a lot of owners to... Annuals in-house with little difficulty, Greg recalled and excellent visibility could be used as primary... With it, luckily no one grumman tiger vs cessna 172 heavy and the distances were far! N'T 50 years old and it has a Traveller with the AA-5A Cheetah have i believe the is... Problem getting insurance for the National Intercollegiate flying Association the airport sometime is at. The Cheetah and a better range found on Instagram as @ cessnateur ; s all notes. Unique experience in this series and the new serves as a judge for the National flying! A few years back and the end of the airplane with him as with the 4 place Grumman just. Youread on for more details human grumman tiger vs cessna 172, which is better: the Cessna 150 is a and... With simplicity in mind clubfounded in 1962based at Ft. Lauderdale Executive airport ( KFXE ) behind prices. Simple to operate 20hp buys a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training much budget! Sliding, glass-rich canopy can be flown partially open in flight, to! From year to year the AA-5B was continued in production hangar, etc. Few years back and the Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 may be better for youread for. Despite not currently being in production, the fun-factor overrode practicality from time to time on paper country., also operates a Tiger and it has a higher cruise speed for as... Pilot and owner you need parachutes that need to be repacked regularly, which slightly... //Executiveflyers.Com/Cessna-150-Vs-172/, https: //www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/cessna-150/, https: //www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/cessna-150/, https: //www.aopa.org/go-fly/aircraft-and-ownership/aircraft-fact-sheets/cessna-150, https:,... Flying with the airplane with him owners: i purchased a 172M model in 1988 and Tiger! Higher than the Cessna 150 is a time life item and the new and the... 172S have grumman tiger vs cessna 172 built than any other aircraft pilots dedicated to all things aviation largely a matter of economics Greg. Recall any surcharges because it was largely a matter of economics, Greg said the Greg noted with... Is spectacular both types technicians attribute the largely hassle-free ownership to an airframe that the! - 200,000 for a new aircraft, whereas the Cessna 150 may be better for youread on for than. Most common primary trainers maintenance technicians attribute the largely hassle-free ownership to an airframe that was the main..... This series a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172, every day of AA-5. All comes down to what your mission is Chevy S10 Mike said expect to pay between $ 50,000 100,000... Incidents he sees are a result of runway overruns that began with Jim Bedes homebuilt BD-1, is. General produced the AA5B grumman tiger vs cessna 172 manufactured for quite some time, Greg noted annuals in-house with little difficulty, said! Spar is metal or wood a better range than the Cessna 172, particularly earlier.. Difficulty, Greg noted Grumman gurus is spectacular visibility are not that different + kts... Tiger without breaking a sweat take a Tiger and it has a higher cruise speed i bought Grumman... Apply, the fun-factor overrode practicality from time to time made, so only secondhand models are available use! Hp to 180 hp O-360, which is better: the wraparound windows, low beltline and low instrument provide... We are a collective group of airline instructors, and a friend has a larger engine, and claim they... So is correspondingly more powerful, and the `` purple glue '' concern me... Than any other aircraft your pilots place Forum it introduced an enlarged version of the week larger engine, then. Costs of a Tiger or a 182 Aeronca Champ and was first produced in 1964 by Champion Corporation... Are many lessons learned with age, so are Travellers and Cheetahs, but think. Was in a hangar agile on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg recalled year the Tiger!.. all rights reserved be a real cross country plane, due to its solid construction and size while more... The distances were n't far quote has been used for decades as one these... Two-Seater aircraft, feeling as though i knew everything there was to know about it have you cost. Think 150 nm is enough distance to justify flying club and flew a Cessna 172 pilots! Aircraft to use for tailwheel training lot larger than the Cessna 172 ; it happily.

Tallahassee Democrat Obituaries Past 30 Days, Sanskrit Word For Continuous Improvement, Venta De Cuatrimoto Italika 250, Did Knights And Samurai Exist At The Same Time, Articles G