We started our empirical analysis following the conceptual heuristics of Schendzielorz and Reinhart (2020), who provided elements of a minimal and maximum model of the peer review process. Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. So to reduce the noise and to uncover the core process, we deleted all edges, which had a multiplicity of less than 1% of the number of items. This highlights the differences between the consultation and decision components of the process. To obtain While the potential exploitation of these process generated data may support the administration, it at the same time may also put more pressure on the editor, simply because these data can be shared and discussed with potential stakeholders of the publisher. [CDATA[// >

Memphis Inmate Search, Mullet Haircut Saying Party In The Back, Carnival Cruise Covid Testing Locations, Essex Cricket Pathway, Articles E